<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WholesomeWear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/</link>
	<description>davemiers.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>andrew h - you&#039;re probably right.&lt;br/&gt;boardies and rashie are sensible in not showing too much to wandering eyes... covering up more from uv probs... and they don&#039;t look incredibly daggy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andrew h &#8211; you&#8217;re probably right.<br />boardies and rashie are sensible in not showing too much to wandering eyes&#8230; covering up more from uv probs&#8230; and they don&#8217;t look incredibly daggy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew H from Matcham</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew H from Matcham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I think they are a bit too much!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Certainly great to stop wandering eyes, but I just think they will become a bit of a joke.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What&#039;s wrong with a rashie and boardies. As long as its not a bikini then it&#039;s a step in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they are a bit too much!</p>
<p>Certainly great to stop wandering eyes, but I just think they will become a bit of a joke.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s wrong with a rashie and boardies. As long as its not a bikini then it&#8217;s a step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewaterboy</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>thewaterboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Hmm the photo&#039;s made me cringe. I wonder if they offer a line of swimwear for males. Its a bit geeky i think, aside from the christian perspective on things (is it a christain site? there was no mention of it.) its taking us back to the 1930&#039;s, is that a good thing? or back to the days where dancing was sinful. I think if a male struggles that much with seeing females in swimmers that they should be made to cover up so much maybe he shouldnt go to the pool or beach. Im sure the skin cancer council would love this line though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm the photo&#8217;s made me cringe. I wonder if they offer a line of swimwear for males. Its a bit geeky i think, aside from the christian perspective on things (is it a christain site? there was no mention of it.) its taking us back to the 1930&#8242;s, is that a good thing? or back to the days where dancing was sinful. I think if a male struggles that much with seeing females in swimmers that they should be made to cover up so much maybe he shouldnt go to the pool or beach. Im sure the skin cancer council would love this line though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewaterboy</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>thewaterboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2006/06/02/wholesomewear/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Hmm the photo&#039;s made me cringe. I wonder if they offer a line of swimwear for males. Its a bit geeky i think, aside from the christian perspective on things (is it a christain site? there was no mention of it.) its taking us back to the 1930&#039;s, is that a good thing? or back to the baptist days where dancing was sinful. I think if a male struggles that much with seeing females in swimmers that they should be made to cover up so much maybe he shouldnt go to the pool or beach. Im sure the skin cancer council would love this line though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm the photo&#8217;s made me cringe. I wonder if they offer a line of swimwear for males. Its a bit geeky i think, aside from the christian perspective on things (is it a christain site? there was no mention of it.) its taking us back to the 1930&#8242;s, is that a good thing? or back to the baptist days where dancing was sinful. I think if a male struggles that much with seeing females in swimmers that they should be made to cover up so much maybe he shouldnt go to the pool or beach. Im sure the skin cancer council would love this line though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

