<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gospel Evidences and Image Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/</link>
	<description>davemiers.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hey dave, one of my friends saw a cyREVOLUTION flyer and knew it was from our youth just by looking at it. How weird is that? Do you think it is good or bad? I think good (as long as its well designed as well as recognisable - which i think it is)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;consistency with branding is good i think.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;one of the reasons this year may have been i didn&#039;t have time to make a new flyer - so used the ones from last year... and just changed the details.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;peaceout</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hey dave, one of my friends saw a cyREVOLUTION flyer and knew it was from our youth just by looking at it. How weird is that? Do you think it is good or bad? I think good (as long as its well designed as well as recognisable &#8211; which i think it is)</i></p>
<p>consistency with branding is good i think.</p>
<p>one of the reasons this year may have been i didn&#8217;t have time to make a new flyer &#8211; so used the ones from last year&#8230; and just changed the details.</p>
<p>peaceout</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>I rarely do anything like this, but when I do I use Photoshop elements.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hey dave, one of my friends saw a cyREVOLUTION flyer and knew it was from our youth just by looking at it. How weird is that? Do you think it is good or bad? I think good (as long as its well designed as well as recognisable - which i think it is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rarely do anything like this, but when I do I use Photoshop elements.</p>
<p>Hey dave, one of my friends saw a cyREVOLUTION flyer and knew it was from our youth just by looking at it. How weird is that? Do you think it is good or bad? I think good (as long as its well designed as well as recognisable &#8211; which i think it is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>On donating, rarely. I think I&#039;ve donated to a developer once or twice. Perhaps I should think about it more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On donating, rarely. I think I&#8217;ve donated to a developer once or twice. Perhaps I should think about it more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>Woah, thanks mate. Here&#039;s the edit.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The GIMP is just as capable as Photoshop, with one missing feature: CMYK colour spaces for print production. Other than that, it can do all the same things, just not quite as intuitively. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you want something a little easier to use (arguably), try &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://plasticbugs.com/?page_id=294&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; GIMPShop &lt;/a&gt;, which is a front end for The GIMP (actually it&#039;s a standalone app) with all the tools and menus set up to look and feel like PS. And the price is right. Avail. on all platforms.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For Mac users: if you&#039;d like something to quickly resize, chop and even upload photos to a server, try &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://xtralean.com/IWOverview.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; ImageWell &lt;/a&gt;. It has all the drag-and-drop functionality you&#039;re used to on the Mac and also costs nothing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Man, how good is freeware?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;PS For more free stock photos (*use them sparingly, for the love of Pete*) see the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.sxc.hu/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stock.xchng&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, thanks mate. Here&#8217;s the edit.</p>
<p>The GIMP is just as capable as Photoshop, with one missing feature: CMYK colour spaces for print production. Other than that, it can do all the same things, just not quite as intuitively. </p>
<p>If you want something a little easier to use (arguably), try <a HREF="http://plasticbugs.com/?page_id=294" REL="nofollow"> GIMPShop </a>, which is a front end for The GIMP (actually it&#8217;s a standalone app) with all the tools and menus set up to look and feel like PS. And the price is right. Avail. on all platforms.</p>
<p>For Mac users: if you&#8217;d like something to quickly resize, chop and even upload photos to a server, try <a HREF="http://xtralean.com/IWOverview.html" REL="nofollow"> ImageWell </a>. It has all the drag-and-drop functionality you&#8217;re used to on the Mac and also costs nothing.</p>
<p>Man, how good is freeware?</p>
<p>PS For more free stock photos (*use them sparingly, for the love of Pete*) see the <a HREF="http://www.sxc.hu/" REL="nofollow">stock.xchng</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>hey ben you might want to change the link of gimpshop... it&#039;s a friends email addy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;maybe copy, edit then delete the original post?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;thanks for the suggestions guys.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;free is good.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;do you ever feel obliged to donate to these products??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey ben you might want to change the link of gimpshop&#8230; it&#8217;s a friends email addy.</p>
<p>maybe copy, edit then delete the original post?</p>
<p>thanks for the suggestions guys.</p>
<p>free is good.</p>
<p>do you ever feel obliged to donate to these products??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielS</title>
		<link>http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemiers.com/2007/06/12/gospel-evidences-and-image-software/#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Have a look over at &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://design4church.blogspot.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Graphic Design Tips for Church&lt;/a&gt; they&#039;ve had a discussion there in the past about good software to use as well as how to implement good design methods for church publications &amp; websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look over at <a HREF="http://design4church.blogspot.com/" REL="nofollow">Graphic Design Tips for Church</a> they&#8217;ve had a discussion there in the past about good software to use as well as how to implement good design methods for church publications &#038; websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

